In a cohesive team, decision-making is most likely to be characterized by which of the following?

In a cohesive team, decision-making is characterized by collaborative participation because this approach fosters an inclusive environment where all members feel valued and encouraged to contribute their ideas and perspectives. Collaborative participation promotes open communication, active listening, and the sharing of diverse viewpoints, which strengthen team cohesion and lead to more effective decisions. This method helps build trust and accountability among team members, enhancing the likelihood of commitment to the outcomes of the decision.

In contrast, top-down mandates can create a disconnect between leadership and team members, stifling input and potentially generating resentment. Individual assertion tends to focus on personal agendas rather than the team’s collective goals, which can lead to conflict and disengagement within the group. Majority rule, while it can facilitate decision-making in some circumstances, may overlook minority viewpoints and undermine team cohesion if the emphasis is solely on reaching a numerical consensus without fostering collaborative dialogue. Therefore, the emphasis on collaborative participation underlines the strength and benefits of teamwork in effectively reaching decisions that everyone is invested in.